Is there a market for blookworms? One day after the BusinessWeek news analysis of blooks, CNET has published an article on the blog debate the article has sparked off.
"These so called 75,000 new online diaries are not, by any stretch of the imagination mostly diaries. They are everything from diaries, to marketing channels, to sales channels, to small business models, to PR venues and more…Now, this extremely ridiculous label called ‘blook’ is trying to stick to the blogosphere (another outdated name) and keep the whole concept of mass communication via this platform in the realm of ‘tiddly-winks, thing-a-mabobs and watch-ya-macall-its’. Listen, not every new idea or process that results from this platform needs to start with ‘bl’. I don’t have a solution to this naming convention catastrophe, but, I do know that it’s not pretty."
Huh. There’s a new way of getting published, and this blogger cries out at the naming convention. Pity indeed. He completely missed the point - the renewed interest in blooks. Perhaps its a breath of fresh air to support the traditional publishing agency. Perhaps its just a passing fad. Either way its a poor comment CNET added to their article, even if they’re trying to show the critics of the movement - but then i can think of so many other logical reasons as to why the blooking phenomenon can fail.
However, another blogger, Louise Marley, had a very good point.
True indeed. Lulu would be a good place to start."Am I being a dinosaur for feeling that this will mean even more stratification? 75,000 new online journals every day implies, to me, the old needle-in-a-haystack dilemma: many are called (or at least are hopeful) but damned few will be found. There are a few fascinating jewels that have come out of blogs, of course–though they seem mostly to deal with war and sex. Is there a market? Would the rest of you go in search of a blook?"
